/Submit incident

AI hallucination and reliability failures

Definition

Hallucination incidents document cases where an AI system produced outputs that were factually incorrect, fabricated, or misleading in ways that caused measurable harm, material misrepresentation, or erosion of trust in a consequential context.

Included

  • False citations or fabricated legal, medical, or scientific references that were acted upon
  • Incorrect factual claims generated by AI that influenced decisions with real-world consequences
  • AI-generated content that misrepresented events, statistics, or named individuals
  • Failures in AI-powered navigation, diagnosis, or recommendation systems due to incorrect outputs
  • AI agents that confidently executed incorrect actions based on hallucinated facts

Excluded

  • Minor inaccuracies in low-stakes contexts with no material consequence
  • Outputs that were ambiguous or incomplete but not factually false
  • Failures of intent, tone, or style rather than factual accuracy
Hallucination incidents over time
Documented incidents per year of occurrence. *2026 to date.
Timeline chart: requires category field in dataset (planned)
Unit: incidents · Source: AI Incidents Index v2026.09 · Counts reflect documented incidents, not prevalence

Incident records

Category-level filtering is not yet available in this dataset release. Showing the 5 most recent incidents across the full index.

Sep 2026R. M. v. MohrCourtListenerSep 2026Florine Williams v. Wogan Group, LLC, D/B/A Chapel Ridge Apartments of Forrest CityCourtListenerSep 2026FTC Endorses Education Department Proposal to Expand Higher Education Accreditation OptionsFTCSep 2026AI-Assisted Cheating in English Exam Leads to Suspended Sentence in South KoreaOECDSep 2026Microsoft Patents AI System for Contextual In-Game AdvertisingOECD
Browse all incidents →